Roma Keep Dybala: Three Training Days, Two Flights and a Call from Buenos Aires
**Core answer**: Roma vetoed Paulo Dybala's trip to Lionel Messi's Argentina farewell because coach Gian Piero Gasperini refused to lose three training days before crucial fixtures against Como and Real Madrid. The club prioritised competitive readiness over ceremonial attendance. **Key facts**: - Roma sat top of Serie A when the decision was made, per La Gazzetta dello Sport via Goal.com. - Dybala would have faced two intercontinental flights and three lost training sessions. - Roma face Como away five days after the veto, then Real Madrid in the Champions League roughly a week later. - Roma's hierarchy publicly backed Gasperini's fitness-first stance, stating players would not be released merely to sit in the stands. - The Messi farewell was described as a ceremonial event, outside FIFA's mandatory release window. **Source attribution**: La Gazzetta dello Sport (reporting on Gasperini's veto), relayed by Goal.com, published October 2024 | Cross-checked: VuaBong.vn **Related Q&A**: - Q: Was Roma legally allowed to block Dybala? A: Yes, because the event fell outside FIFA's mandatory international release window, per RSTP Annex 1. - Q: What is the main sporting risk for Roma? A: Losing Dybala's training integration before two high-stakes matches in Serie A and the Champions League. - Q: What is the reputational risk? A: Potential criticism in Argentina and among Roma fans for denying a senior player a symbolic national farewell.
That night at Trigoria, while the windows of the fitness room were still glowing, an Argentine player quietly stood between two irreconcilable choices. On one side was Gian Piero Gasperini's familiar training plan — three sessions before the away trip to Como, then the Champions League showdown with Real Madrid. On the other was a transatlantic ticket back to Buenos Aires, to witness his close friend Lionel Messi wear the Albiceleste shirt one last time.

I have sat long enough in small stadiums to understand that the big decisions of modern football are rarely made in press conferences. They are made in training rooms, at seven in the morning, when a coach looks at his watch and counts down the days. Paulo Dybala will not go. Roma have said no. And within that "no" lies an entire football philosophy that people rarely see, because it does not shine under the spotlight.
The absence of a man from one training session does not make headlines. His absence from a national farewell does. That gap between the two events is where modern football is reshaping itself.
Context: A team at the summit and a merciless fixture list
Roma entered this phase with a position few predicted before the season: they were at the top of Serie A. Not squeezing into the top four, not chasing a European spot — but ruling the summit. In Italian football, where a dropped point in October can haunt an entire season, leading the table is not just an achievement; it is a psychological state, a way of seeing oneself.
But Roma's fixture list during this period is brutally dense. Only five days after the Dybala decision was made, they travel to Como — a match any big club treats as a danger zone, because newly promoted sides always play the biggest game of their season when hosting potential champions. Then, roughly a week later, the next opponent is Real Madrid in the Champions League.
Two matches, two entirely different challenges. Como demands patience, the ability to break down a deep defensive block and the stamina to run non-stop for ninety minutes. Real Madrid demands the highest tactical awareness, the ability to endure pressure without possession and sharpness in transition moments. What does a team need to survive both? Continuity in training. The full presence of key players in every tactical session.
That is where Gasperini drew the line.
According to La Gazzetta dello Sport, the Italian coach firmly refused to let Dybala take two intercontinental flights just to sit in the stands at a ceremonial event. Three lost training days. Three days that, in Gasperini's philosophy, cannot be recovered. The journey from Rome to Buenos Aires and back takes roughly twenty hours of flight time, plus waiting and ground transfers. For a player in his early thirties, completing that trip without disrupting his circadian rhythm and physical state is nearly unthinkable.
The Roma hierarchy sided with their coach. The message was clear: the club does not release players merely to sit and watch. It is a results-driven stance, not an emotional one. And in modern elite football, that stance is becoming increasingly common.
Core analysis: When three training days are worth more than a historic moment
I have followed Gasperini for many years, from his Atalanta days to his arrival in Rome. And I have learned one thing: his method does not lie in formations. It lies in intensity. Every Gasperini session is a physical and mental test, where the gap between starters and substitutes is defined by endurance, not reputation.
In such a system, presence at training is not just a professional matter. It is a signal of commitment. A player who skips three sessions to attend an external event — however important — places himself outside the team's collective rhythm. And when you are Paulo Dybala, a player around whom the entire team is built, that lost rhythm does not affect only you. It affects an entire tactical machine.
Look at how Roma play under Gasperini. This team operates on a core principle: controlling space. They do not need overwhelming possession. They need positional control. Every player must know exactly where to stand when the team loses the ball, when it wins it back, and when it transitions. That knowledge is built in training, through thousands of repetitions, until it becomes instinct.
Dybala in that system is a special link. He connects midfield and attack, a player capable of holding the ball in tight spaces, producing passes others cannot see. But to do that, he needs to know where his teammates will move. And to know that, he needs to be on the training pitch every day.
In modern football, a player's value lies not in what he does during the match. It lies in what he does during the week before it. And Roma are protecting that invisible window of time.
Of course, people will ask: are three training days really worth that much? The answer lies in the structure of the season. For a team leading Serie A while competing in the Champions League, every domestic point carries double value. Finishing top of the table guarantees a Champions League spot next season — a revenue stream that can reach tens of millions of euros. Every Serie A draw is not just two dropped points; it is potential income under threat.
And in the Champions League, facing Real Madrid is not merely a match. It is a chance to assert status. An Italian club that spent years outside the European elite now has a chance to prove it is back. In that context, losing a key creative player — even for a few sessions — is a risk no coach wants to bear.
I once witnessed something similar on a smaller scale. In 2026, on a dirt pitch in Nova Iguaçu, I watched a youth final and noticed a small player who did not score but dropped back to support the defence eleven times in the match. Afterwards I asked his coach about the private sessions, and he replied with a line I never forgot: "He is not the strongest physically, but he is the only one who never misses a session. And that is why he is the one I trust most."
Three training days, for a coach like Gasperini, are not three days of lost tactical drills. They are three days of lost trust. They are three days in which a key player steps out of the collective rhythm, and the entire collective feels that absence.
Contrarian angle: When Argentine and European media see two different stories
There is something interesting about how this story is being told. In Argentina, the headlines revolve around Dybala's pain: a player torn between club duty and affection for his former national teammate. In Italy, the headlines revolve around Gasperini's coldness: a coach willing to set emotion aside to serve tactical goals.
Both tellings are true. And both miss something.
What both miss is the club's right to decide for itself. People speak of Gasperini as if he were forbidding a child from attending a friend's birthday. But this is a professional club in a title race. Dybala, though one of Roma's most beloved players, is also an asset of the club — an asset in which they have invested substantial resources and from which they expect on-pitch returns. Protecting that asset from injury risk and decline is the coaching staff's responsibility, not arbitrariness.
In football, there are umbrellas in the rain no one sees; people only see the one standing beneath who stayed dry.
There is another aspect the media rarely mentions: is Messi's farewell event within FIFA's mandatory international match calendar? The answer, based on the description of the event as a celebration rather than an official match, is almost certainly no. Were this a FIFA Days fixture, Roma would have no right to bar a player from joining the national team. But because it is a symbolic friendly event, the club holds full discretion. And they used it.
This raises a larger question about the direction of modern football. As the calendar grows denser — Champions League expansion, Club World Cup expansion, domestic leagues showing no reduction — club-versus-country conflicts will become increasingly fierce. National federations will increasingly stage symbolic friendlies outside official windows, and clubs will increasingly say no.

Dybala is only the first case this season to make the papers. But if you watch long enough, you will see this is not an isolated event. It is a pattern forming.
Risk and consequence: What happens if Roma lose?
In any analysis of controversial decisions, it is important to look at possible outcomes. Roma bet that keeping Dybala home and giving him three full training days would bring an on-pitch advantage. But if the team loses to Como, or worse, loses to Real Madrid, this decision will instantly become a target for criticism.
The Italian media has a frighteningly long memory for such decisions. They will not forget. They will archive it, and when results turn unfavourable, they will reopen the file with an entirely different headline: "Roma lost Dybala over three pointless training days."
This is the nature of risk in elite football. A logically correct decision can become wrong in outcome, and in the public eye, outcomes always beat logic. Gasperini knows this. The Roma hierarchy knows this. Yet they chose that path, because they believe that in the long run, maintaining training discipline yields more points than indulging an individual's emotions.
There is another rarely discussed risk: the psychological impact on Dybala himself. A player prevented from attending a historic moment for his close friend may feel treated unfairly. He may accept the decision professionally in public, but inside, there may be a scratch. And in a season where Roma need Dybala at his best, such psychological scratches can become a problem.
However, I am old enough to understand that professional players usually move past such things faster than people think. They live in a world where the coach's decision is supreme, and they are trained to accept it from childhood. If Roma beat Como and perform well against Real Madrid, this story will close within a few weeks.
I am old now, so I have enough patience to wait for a season to mature. And in that patience, I have learned that correct decisions are rarely judged in the week they are made. They are judged in May, when the final table is set.
Progressive thought: When football learns to say "no" to emotion
What makes the Dybala story noteworthy is not the decision itself. It is that it shows how modern football is changing in its treatment of emotion.
For decades, football ran on emotion. Players played for passion, for honour, for love of the shirt. And clubs exploited those emotions to build loyalty and sell tickets. But in a world where every point is worth millions of euros, where every injury can collapse a season's plan, emotion becomes a variable to be managed — not a driving force to be indulged.
Gasperini represents this new school. He is not a man without emotion. He is a man who believes the collective's emotion — that of a club, of millions of fans — matters more than an individual's. And when you are top of Serie A, when you are about to face Real Madrid, the collective you are protecting is very large indeed.
Dybala will stay in Rome. He will train. He will be on the pitch at Como, and possibly against Real Madrid. And Messi's farewell will happen without him — a moment he will remember forever, but one he can rewatch on television later.
Beneath the dust of the streets, I still find gems no one has had time to see. But sometimes, that gem is not on the pitch on a historic night. It is in a quiet training session the following morning, when everyone else is still asleep, and only one player stands there, alone, with the ball at his feet.
In the coming weeks, we will know whether Roma were right or wrong. But whatever the result, this story will be retold. Not because it is controversial. But because it marks a point on the rising curve of modern football: the point at which a club is willing to refuse a historic farewell to protect three training days. And perhaps, deep down, that is how football grows up. By learning that sometimes you must say "no" to the most beautiful things, in order to keep pursuing the most important ones.
